The Rivers State Government has rejected the 48-hour ultimatum issued by the Martins Amaewhule-led House of Assembly, which demanded that Governor Siminalayi Fubara re-present the 2025 Appropriation Bill.
The ultimatum was given during a plenary session on Monday following the recent Supreme Court judgment.
A letter conveying this resolution was reportedly sent to the state government.
However, in a response dated March 5, the government stated that it had not received any official communication from the Assembly.
In a letter signed by the Secretary to the State Government (SSG), Dr. Tammy Danagogo, the administration clarified that its response was based on a document seen on social media.
“As at the close of work on Tuesday, 4th March, 2025, we are yet to receive the said letter.
Neither the office of the governor nor the deputy governor’s office, nor the office of the Accountant-General of the state has received the said letter,” the statement read.
The government emphasized that Governor Fubara remains committed to upholding the rule of law and implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in the best interest of the people of Rivers State.
“We have since been in contact with our lawyers, who are still awaiting the certified true copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court and hereby reassure you and all the good people of Rivers State that as soon as His Excellency receives the judgment, he will strive to implement same in the best interest of our people,” the letter stated.
Governor Fubara had earlier addressed the state on March 2, where he reaffirmed his willingness to comply with the Supreme Court’s ruling, despite his personal views on the matter.
The government’s stance suggests that while the administration is prepared to act within the confines of the law, it will not be pressured into hasty decisions without proper legal documentation.
Meanwhile, the ultimatum issued by the House of Assembly has added another layer of tension to the already complex political climate in Rivers State.
The standoff highlights the ongoing power struggle between the executive and legislative arms of government.
Observers believe that while the Supreme Court judgment provides legal clarity, the implementation process requires caution to ensure stability in governance.
Therefore, the state government’s insistence on receiving the certified judgment before taking action reflects a commitment to due process rather than defiance.
While the House of Assembly seeks urgent compliance, the government maintains that procedural correctness must be prioritized.
As the situation unfolds, Rivers State residents await the next steps from both the executive and legislative branches.
