The Nnamdi Kanu terrorism trial took an unexpected turn on Thursday as the Federal High Court in Abuja began delivering judgment in the IPOB leader’s case without him present.
Moreover, the tense moment unfolded after Justice James Omotosho ruled that the trial would continue despite Kanu’s refusal to cooperate.
The decision followed a heated exchange in which Kanu challenged the judge and refused to allow the proceedings to move forward.
He claimed that he had not filed his final written address and openly accused the court of bias.
His outburst became the breaking point in a case that has stretched over several years.
The situation escalated when Kanu shouted, “Which law states that you can charge me on an unwritten law? Show me.
Omotosho, where is the law? Any judgment declared in this Court is a complete rubbish.”
The courtroom atmosphere shifted immediately, prompting the judge to step out briefly before returning to continue the session.
Furthermore, the court dismissed three fresh motions filed by Kanu, saying they lacked merit.
Senior Advocate of Nigeria Adegboyega Awomolo led the prosecution team and urged the court to invoke Section 352(5) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act.
He argued that the defendant’s persistent interruptions made it impossible to proceed normally.
Following this request, security personnel were instructed to remove Kanu from the courtroom.
Justice Omotosho then resumed the judgment delivery, marking a decisive moment in the long-running trial.
The judge stressed that although defendants have a right to be present, misconduct can justify their removal.
In addition, Justice Omotosho reminded the courtroom that it remains “a temple of justice and a temple of God,” which must not be disrupted by any party.
He noted that Kanu had shown similar behaviour in past sittings and had often stated he would not present a defence.
Therefore, the court found no reason to delay the process any further.
The Nnamdi Kanu terrorism trial has already drawn national attention, and Thursday’s development added another layer to the unfolding legal drama.
